国产三级大片在线观看-国产三级电影-国产三级电影经典在线看-国产三级电影久久久-国产三级电影免费-国产三级电影免费观看

Set as Homepage - Add to Favorites

【porno izlemek neden yasak】Wikipedia demotes Breitbart to fake news

Source:Feature Flash Editor:knowledge Time:2025-07-02 10:13:50

Wikipedia,porno izlemek neden yasak the internet's crowd-sourced encyclopedia, has declared "fake news" on far-right site Breitbart, deeming the outlet an unreliable source for facts.

SEE ALSO: Milo Yiannopoulos' Facebook rant shows that de-platforming actually works

The decision, flagged by Motherboard, was declared on September 25, 2018 after an ongoing discussion amongst site administrators that concluded, "[Breitbart] should not be used, ever, as a reference for facts, due to its unreliability.

Scrolling through the debate is enlightening, seeing the various reaction from site admins to the nature of Breitbart, with some comparing it to the Daily Mail, the UK paper that was similarly demoted as an unreliable source in 2017.


You May Also Like

Support. If anything, it's even more unreliable than the Daily Mail, as they at least use trained journalists, whereas Breitbart is a fringe propaganda organization which lets its extreme partisan bias get in the way of howit reports things, and whetherit does so, just as Fox News does. It too should be deprecated, but let's start with Breitbart (and InfoWars). -- BullRangifer(talk) PingMe17:51, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

And:

Mashable Trend Report Decode what’s viral, what’s next, and what it all means. Sign up for Mashable’s weekly Trend Report newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

Support. I don't like the use of blanket bans, but Breitbart seems to satisfy the conditions that required the Daily Mail one - an obviously unreliable source, with a reputation for inaccurate stories, which a few users nonetheless insist on trying to use as if it were a reliable news source.

Some opposed the comparison, too, claiming the issue with the Daily Mail was about fabricated stories rather than unreliability and partisanship:

"I will support a ban for any news outlet if it is proven it is currently fabricating stories on a regular basis, but no evidence of fabrication has been presented in the proposal. The precedent established by The Daily Mailban simply does not apply in this case."

Breitbart isn't completely banned, though, as citations for the site will still be allowed in regards to opinion and commentary.

Motherboard also notes a similar August discussion surrounding Info Wars that was eventually closed citing the "Snowball clause," which states: "If an issue does not have a snowball's chance in hell of being accepted by a certain process, there's no need to run it through the entire process."

TL;DR, no one in their right mind would believe an Info Wars citation anyway so there's no need to ban it.

That President Trump has legitimized both sites did little to sway the Wikipedia decisions so it remains to be seen what this does for his own rallying cry of "fake news."

0.1416s , 8108.6328125 kb

Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【porno izlemek neden yasak】Wikipedia demotes Breitbart to fake news,Feature Flash  

Sitemap

Top 主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产91九色在线播放 | 日韩国产一区二区 | 精品卡一卡2卡3卡4卡 | 好爽毛片一区二区三区四无码视色 | 国内精自视频品一2区 | 欧美精品成人a在线观看 | 精品国产乱码久久久久久浪潮小说 | 伊人久久精品线影院 | 久久精品国产日本波多野结夜 | 日韩欧美亚洲国产精品字幕久久久 | 天天日天天拍天天操 | 国产av无码一区二区三区最新 | 成人午夜免费无码 | www国产亚洲精品久久网站 | 一本色道久久综合无码人妻 | 成人亚洲一线一区在线播放 | 白丝乳交内射一二三区 | 亚洲国产精品一区二区第一页免 | 少妇人妻综合久久中文字幕 | 国产a级特黄的片子视频 | 亚洲欧美日韩综合精品 | 日本高清免费不卡在线 | 亚洲欧洲日本在线 | 久久久久久国产精品免费免费 | 精品久久无码一区二区大长腿 | 婷婷综合色五月久丁香 | 日韩精品一区二区三区在线观看 | 国产成人手机视频 | 久久国产综合精品女同 | 中文线码中文高清播放中 | 99国产精品白浆在线观看 | 国产网红在线 | 激情黄网 | 99爱在线精品视频网站 | AV怡红院AV男人的天堂 | 久久久一级 | 中文字幕乱人伦视频在线 | 国产一卡2卡3卡4卡无卡国色 | 欧美三级网站在线观看 | 无码精品久久一区二区三区武则天 | 国产在线欧美日韩一区二区 |