What sells at the box office?siki? izleme net Historically, the answer for film studios, distributors, and their executives has been a white male lead. This bias hasn't changed, according to a new study undertaken by the University of Southern California. And more importantly, it may be wrong entirely.
The study from USC Annenberg's Inclusion Initiative, which was founded by communications professor Dr. Stacy L. Smith, found that identity of protagonists has little to do with determining success at the box office. The report looked at a sample of 126 top-grossing, live-action films from 2021 and 2022, examining factors that led to their box office success. The selection included only live action movies with solo leads — no re-releases or storylines with co-leads or ensemble casts.
SEE ALSO: ‘Barbie’ tops $1 billion, a new box office milestone for female directorsThe most significant finding is that films featuring male or white protagonists did not perform better theatrically than films led by female characters or underrepresented groups. That is, there is "no significant benefit" to having a male white lead in a starring role.
There's an even more systemic problem here. Theatrical support for films with such leads remains significantly higher than for movies with other leads. Women are consistently provided with fewer resources for production. Films with white male leads or underrepresented male leads have higher promotional budgets than those with white or underrepresented female leads.
"Movies about white male characters are still released most often by studios and distributors," Smith explained in a statement.
"The system was built to favor storytelling about one group: white males," Smith continued. "It is the way that executives support movies about white men that drives their success, not the protagonist themselves."
Other findings in the study reveal similar bias. Over half of the movies with the highest budgets (of $100 million or more) in the two-year period starred white males. Meanwhile, 15.8 percent featured a white female lead, and only 10.5 percent had an underrepresented female lead.
In reality, the study concludes, factors for box office success lie in the support structure for the film: namely production budget, marketing costs, and its widest point of release. These factors are simply more often applied to movies starring men.
Topics Film Social Good
No, Emma González did not rip up the U.S. ConstitutionWhat would a 'Queer Eye' led by queer women look like?Luigi has a bulge, and we don't know what to do with this informationMan perfectly responds to a Twitter request made by a woman 7 years agoFDA head Gottlieb announces plans to regulate nicotine in cigarettesRead the Obamas' heartwarming letter to the survivors of the Parkland school shootingTaylor Swift's March For Our Lives post is a bigger deal than it seemsIvanka Trump pretended to be a scientist and 'tested' some vape juiceTaylor Swift's March For Our Lives post is a bigger deal than it seemsUSA oil memes are the new interventionist commentary we need Arizona's M3F Festival is a nonprofit, community Page turn animation on Apple's Books app is back in latest iOS beta Meta supports new platform preventing spread of minors' intimate images online Meta has massive plans for VR, despite users not being that into it Warner Bros. Discovery sues Paramount over 'South Park' streaming rights These leaders in AI, VC, more are working to answer some of tech's pressing questions Proposed Texas bill could block access to abortion websites Ancient astronomers saw a supernova. Scientists just captured the explosion. 'The Last of Us' includes Ellie's favourite 'Savage Starlight' comics I was tired of slow
0.1511s , 10086.7890625 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【siki? izleme net】White male leads don't equal box office success. But executives and studios are still biased.,Feature Flash