国产三级大片在线观看-国产三级电影-国产三级电影经典在线看-国产三级电影久久久-国产三级电影免费-国产三级电影免费观看

Set as Homepage - Add to Favorites

【uk sex ed video banned from youtube】Moving Targets

Source:Feature Flash Editor:fashion Time:2025-07-02 22:06:36
Katherine Cross ,uk sex ed video banned from youtube July 27, 2017

Moving Targets

The trans ban and the crowdsourcing of hatred The ban on trans people in the military is not a distraction. / Peter Samofalov
Word Factory W
o
r
d

F
a
c
t
o
r
y

With a few tweets that seemed to serve as “guidance” for the Department of Defense, President Trump appears to have banned transgender people from U.S. military service. We are now well into the “rule by tweeted decree” phase of this phantasmagorical presidency. Over the past few years alone, we’ve seen the digitized course of our political life casually trash the foolish conventional wisdom holding that ?“the internet isn’t real life” at least a thousand times over. But this is a mocking coup de grace, even from a man whose stock and trade is the beclowning of democracy.

We are now debating, in real time, whether three tweets constitute policy. It looks like they do; heaven help us.

This was not the first attack on trans people by Donald Trump, of course. He and his “beleaguered” attorney general, Jeff Sessions, have been noisily undoing the halting progress made on behalf of trans rights under the Obama administration. In February, for instance, they withdrew Obama’s guidance on Title IX, which argued that the gender equity law protected transgender kids’ rights and access to equal accommodation.

But this latest move is especially invidious, even if its policy implications are extraordinarily murky for now. Whether we like it or not (and I certainly do not), ours is a militaristic nation that has elevated its armed forces to a Valhalla of worshipfulness. To borrow the satirical Starship Troopers slogan, “Service guarantees citizenship!” Who’s allowed to serve is a fair marker of who is and is not considered an equal citizen in the eyes of the U.S. government. For good, and for so much ill, the military is America’s idealized vision of itself. To pointedly exclude a class of people from it, or permit them to serve unequally within it, as our segregated armed forces did for decades, is to put a clear message up in lights for all the nation to see: “these people are undesirable.”

We can oppose Trump’s order and everything it sets out to do without valorizing the military’s bombs and bombast.

This is entirely agnostic to the otherwise important criticisms to be made of the military and its role in the American imperial project. It is certainly true that acceptance in the armed services is not a royal road to equality. But it doesclose off one powerful argument for bigots, which isn’t nothing. In a country where military symbolism is paramount, acceptance in the armed services sends a clear message. It’s simply a fact of American life that much of our culture lies downstream from our military.

Speaking as a trans woman, I will say it’s a bit grating to suddenly see all of these political leaders—including Republicans!—stand up and say, on this issue, “transgender people are people,” (a phrase that ranks rather high on the list of “Things I Never Thought I’d Hear From Orrin Hatch’s Mouth”). The issues facing us are legion and urgent; each passing year heaves with the deaths of dozens of transgender women of color, murdered in cold blood. Trans people of color and trans sex workers are over-incarcerated, over-policed, and denied every conceivable opportunity; yet this daily background radiation of terror and manifest injustice did not merit the full throated outcry we see today.

Still, belated outcries are very much ?preferable to the alternative, and it’s at least somewhat reassuring that so many people in power recognize that there’s a cruel caprice to Trump’s senseless decree. That should be the response across the political spectrum.

On the left, we’ve been living a life of murderous political triage for the last several months, having to set aside one lofty cause or argument to address the many things on fire right now. It’s much the same here. As distasteful as it will be to argue for military inclusion, the cost for notdoing so is to legitimize a clear attempt to paint a target on all trans people’s backs.

This Trump order, after all, will further poison a climate that is already choking so many of us, regardless of whether we happen to be in uniform; Trump’s words portray us as a disordered burden, a stereotype that directly impacts every aspect of our lives—employment, healthcare access, equal protection under the law. Sitting back and clicking your teeth about “homonationalism” won’t end the American empire; it will, rather, ?only allow a bigoted president to sell out a vulnerable minority group without meaningful opposition. Leftist and anti-imperialist voices should not cede the field of opposition to militaristic centrists; we can oppose Trump’s order and everything it sets out to do without valorizing the military’s bombs and bombast.

In the same vein, we should resist the zero-sum logic of the “distraction” meme—a zombie idea that keeps lurching out of the many shallow graves dug for it by a host of marginalized people. From right to left, many arguing that Trump’s tweets about trans people in the military are a mere “distraction” from any number of things: the Russia investigation; the ongoing, murderous healthcare debate; or, apparently, from Trump’s secret plan to get trans people intothe military according to Julian Assange:

Oh, to have the luxury of believing this sort of rectal-gazing nonsense!

As ever, Chelsea Manning shows us how to thread the needle; both critiquing military excess (like the F-35 boondoggle) and standing up for trans service people.

All the “distraction” skylarking on behalf of Trump’s antagonists and defenders alike serves in this context to ignore or downplay all of the terrible ripple effects that this proposed ban will have. One can, and indeed must, argue this critical point without being cast as an indiscriminate apologist for American atrocities.

But there’s also a larger thing to note about the “distraction” argument: It almost always comes up around Trump’s direct attacks on the vulnerable. When the Muslim ban made its ugly appearance in the first weeks of the Trump administration, the savvy observers clamored to declare it a “distraction.” These, mind you, were some of the very liberals Assange claims to be nothing like. Trump’s attack on the non-white cast of Hamiltonlikewise was waved away as a distraction—a claim hard to square alongside the vicious and exterminationist anti-immigrant rhetoric he unleashed in Ohio this week. ?So were his tweeted attacks on people like union leaders, which directly sparked a wave of threats and abuse from Trump’s troll army.

What is actually happening, regardless of Trump’s own intentions or highly limited ability to plan, is the DDoSing of democracy.

All of which is to say that these provocations and bigoted outbursts are not distractions. They are, instead the content of Trump’s beliefs and praxis.

The man lacks subtlety and likely the ?capacity to think about creating opportunistic distractions via his Twitter-outrage. What he says and does obeys no logic or master plan—but these words and actions do have dire material impacts on the lives of ordinary people, most of whom happen to be non-white, or immigrants, or queer and trans.

But to deny a brilliant rhetorical strategy here doesn’t rule out the use of Trump’s multifront attacks on vulnerable citizens as a crucial tactic. What is actually happening, regardless of Trump’s own intentions or highly limited ability to plan, is the DDoSing of democracy. The idea is to simply ?barrage ?opposition forces ?with so many urgent issues to fight that they are overwhelmed. This tactic also directly abets the normalization of Trump’s extremist, trollish governance. Trump lacks the savvy to do any of this intentionally—but it’s nonetheless the net effect of his narcissistic, hateful, self-indulgent rule. Any trace of a method here—or lingering suggestion that his heinous advisors are calling the shots—stems from the obvious political utility of Trump-sanctioned hate: as rallying cries to his base to target the most vulnerable. We become, in this construction of authoritarian rule, the thin end of a wedge that people like Steve Bannon hope to drive right into the heart of the principles of equality underlying the democratic ideal. This can be done through policy, of course—but in our age of crowdsourcing and networked movements, it’s far easier to incite people to act extrajudicially. Trump’s Muslim Ban worked less as a legal document and more as blanket permission to CBP officials to indulge their implicit biases; same with his guidance to ICE on immigration enforcement. Why wait on a law when you can just dogwhistle to your most violent supporters who’ll do the work for you while matters grind on through the courts?

This is what’s happening here, in all likelihood: Trump is making us an “issue” for the MAGA crowd. In targeting us, we’ve become the red meat he’s throwing to his base.

On top of it all, now he may be able to rule by tweet.[*] Don’t say trans people didn’t warn you.

 


[*] Update:Since the time of writing the DoD has stated that it won’t implement a ban on the basis of the tweets.

0.1868s , 14299.1171875 kb

Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【uk sex ed video banned from youtube】Moving Targets,Feature Flash  

Sitemap

Top 主站蜘蛛池模板: 狠狠色噜噜狠狠狠狠91 | 欧美一区二区三区婷婷月色 | 91污在线观看一区二区三区 | 久久亚洲精品高潮综合色A片小说 | 久久久久亚洲av无码专区网站 | 国产无遮挡A片又黄又爽漫画 | 欧美亚洲综合高清在线 | 三级午夜a一级三级片 | 亚洲天堂三区 | 色五月情 | 大香伊人网 | 亚洲国产天堂久久综合 | 欧美亚洲精品中文字幕乱码免费 | 精品跪求调教中文字幕无码不卡免 | 神马dy888午夜伦理 | 国产麻豆精品久久久 | 亚洲精品久久精品一区二区 | 日韩精品人妻系列无码av东京 | 人妻天天爽夜夜爽三区麻豆a片 | 国产人妻无码一区二区三区18 | 四虎影视在线影院在线观看 | 久久亚洲aⅴ无码精品午夜麻豆 | 操鸡巴视频免费观看 | 久久精品国产亚洲AV狼友 | 91精品人妻人人做人碰人人爽 | 六月丁香婷婷激情 | 久久国产高清一区二区三区 | 成人小视频在线观看 | 人妻无码a∨中文字幕 | 少妇高潮毛片免费观看A京东热 | 亚洲精品久久久久久中文 | 麻豆视传媒短 | 亚洲乱码AV中文一区二区 | 亚洲精品久久久久久AV | 亚洲成av人片天堂网久久浪潮 | 国产亚洲综合网曝门系列 | 久久久亚洲精品午夜福利 久久久亚洲精品一区二区三区 | 欧美日韩精品一区二区在线播放蜜臀 | 97国产精品欧美一区二区三区 | 99热在这里只有免费精品 | 欧洲日本在线观看 |