国产三级大片在线观看-国产三级电影-国产三级电影经典在线看-国产三级电影久久久-国产三级电影免费-国产三级电影免费观看

Set as Homepage - Add to Favorites

【dominatrix: gender, eroticism, and control in the dungeon summary】ACLU warns that 'no replies' on Twitter could violate the constitution

Source:Feature Flash Editor:hotspot Time:2025-07-02 07:25:38

Trump was basically Obama's reply guy throughout the 2010s,dominatrix: gender, eroticism, and control in the dungeon summary so it's only fitting that he won't be able to take advantage of a new Twitter feature intended to curb his own comment trolls...legally, at least.

Twitter is testing an ability that lets users limit who can reply to their tweets. If you're part of the test, you'll be able to determine whether everyone can reply (the norm and current default), if only people that you follow can reply, or if only people you tag in a tweet can reply. If you don't tag anyone and go with that last option, you're basically turning off all replies, period.

Reactions to the new feature have been mixed. Some people are praising it as a way to stop potential harassers from replying. Others are joking about the feature's elitism. And of course, still more have turned the "no replies" tweet into a meme already.

Mashable Light Speed Want more out-of-this world tech, space and science stories? Sign up for Mashable's weekly Light Speed newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

One important take points out the constitutional and legal ramifications of the feature for public officials. The ACLU has issued a statement that public officials need to be careful about how they use the reply-limiting features, lest they violate the First Amendment.

As a general matter, Twitter’s investment in user controls is a good thing. But public officials would be violating the First Amendment if they were to use this tool to block speakers on any accounts they’ve opened up for public conversation in their roles as government actors. Nor should public officials use this tool to decide who can, or can't, reply to accounts they have opened up for requests for government assistance, which may be on the rise due to COVID-19.

For the past several years, courts have been grappling with whether a public figure blocking someone on Twitter constitutes a violation of their first amendment rights. Most notably, the Court of Appeals upheld a ruling in a lawsuit brought against President Trump, saying that he was not allowed to block people after they had offended or disagreed with him, because it impinged on their freedom to engage in political speech.

The ACLU apparently sees the "no replies" feature as an extension of the idea of blocking because it limits speech in what has effectively become a digital public square. So, the new test features might be valuable, but people in the public eye are going to have to be careful about how they use them.

Topics Social Media X/Twitter Politics

0.3304s , 9920.1875 kb

Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【dominatrix: gender, eroticism, and control in the dungeon summary】ACLU warns that 'no replies' on Twitter could violate the constitution,Feature Flash  

Sitemap

Top 主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产免费人妻一区二区三区 | 欧美性A片又硬又粗又大暴力 | 久久久久久少妇久久久久久 | 亚洲国产精品一区二区成人小说 | 国产suv一区二区:新车型发布引发市场热议 | 黄桃AV无码免费一区二区三区 | A片扒开双腿进入做视频 | 久久久免费的精品 | 99在线视频观看 | 中文字幕精品一区 | 亚洲综合色五月久久婷婷 | 美女性生活毛片 | 日日噜噜爽爽狠狠视频 | 成人免费一区在线播放 | 少妇厨房出轨激情做爰 | 欧美做愛坉片 | 久久久久久久网 | 国产人妻系列无码专区第二页 | 亚洲色大成网址在线观看 | 日韩av无码综合久久五月 | 亚洲欧美牲交 | 国产人成高清在线视频99 | 久久亚洲av无码精品色午夜麻豆 | 欧美曰韩一区二区三区 | 麻豆传播媒体2023最新网站 | 亚州欧美中文字幕精品综合 | 精品高清一区二区日韩在线 | 91香蕉视频在线看 | 日韩aⅴ人妻无码一区二区 日韩aⅴ无码精品久久人 | 手机在线播放三区久久 | 久久久精品国产免费A片胖妇女 | 男人的天堂精品国产一区 | 亚洲精品美女久久久久99 | 国产麻豆剧传媒精品国产v精品 | 久久91精品国产91久 | 欧美日本高清一本二本三本 | 91精品午夜网站 | 亚洲AV大精永久无码精品 | 久久中文字幕亚洲精品最新 | 日本中年妈妈内裤 | 毛片随便看 |